Friday, January 17, 2014

Fathers: Are they necessary?

Jane
The adoption industry uses fathers--or the absence of them--as a wedge to convince mothers to give up their babies. Fathers who stick around, create a problem for the industry. The industry characterizes them as an obstacle to the best interests of a child. The adoption industry's message to single pregnant women: your baby needs a father, but not the bum who got you pregnant.

LOSING A MOTHER TO GAIN A FATHER
"A child needs a mother...and a father." I'm sure I heard these words more than once in a TV show, spoken by an all-knowing social worker (or parent, teacher, clergyman) to a scared single woman who wanted to keep her baby: The words repeated endlessly in my mind when I was faced with having a child without a husband.

Growing up with a father who was not around much, I was acutely sensitive to what I had missed. Though he and my mother were married and had four children, I envied girls whose fathers ate dinner with the family and talked with them about their school work, their friends, current events, their lives. These fathers gave their daughters rides to school in bad weather. (We didn't own a car.) They took their families to the movies, the amusements park, and, for some lucky girls, to Florida on Christmas vacation escaping the sub-zero weather in Chicago. I was always uncomfortable when other girls talked about their fathers, as in "what does your father do? My father is a lawyer, doctor, engineer, owns a store." My father had a blue-collar job in a steel mill. He spent much of what he earned on liquor and gambling; my mother supported us as a high school teacher. My parents divorced when I was 15, and my father died five years later at 52.

I wanted my child to have a father, a rich powerful father. If the only way that could happen was for her to lose her mother--me--well, I was a loser anyway. I did not foresee that within a year I would meet the most wonderful of men, and a year after that we would marry. I know my husband would have accepted my daughter--he takes in stray cats; a extra kid would not have been a stretch. I have since known mothers who married after keeping their baby and their husbands adopted their children. In fact, step-father adoptions are far more common than voluntary infant stranger adoptions. The adoption industry, of course, downplays the possibility that the next man in your life will love and accept you and your child.

PHONY FACTS IN ADOPTION PROMO
Focus on the Family's adoption promo piece tells mothers-to-be: "Statistically, you're much more likely to meet and marry Mr. Right later on (and avoid another out-of-wedlock pregnancy) if you release [emphasis added here] your baby to loving adoptive parents than you are if you choose single motherhood." It provide no statistics to back up this statement. Release your baby? That makes it sound as if you are releasing her from prison, that is, the poor pitiful life you as a single woman can give this child, who deserves so much better.

Based on first mothers accounts that I have read or heard, more than half of adopted children grow up without both their adoptive parents. Adoptive parents appear to divorce at a higher rate than other couples, perhaps because adopting a child puts a strain on a marriage or perhaps because the couple adopted in hopes of saving a failing marriage. Since adoptive fathers are often in their forties--today it's not uncommon for them to be in their fifties or sixties--there's a good chance they will be gone by the time their children finish college.

Not only is a single mother who keeps her child consigning her child to a life of degradation but, according to Dr. Richard D. Lang of the Christian Post, she is "denying that baby the father that God wants for that baby, and every baby, to have." What God wants, of course, is contingent on who is speaking for God. Lesbian adoptive mother Rosie O'Donnell tells adopted children whom she is raising without a father that God put the baby in the "wrong mommy's tummy. "

Focus on the Family minces no words describing the fate which awaits children who grow up in families without fathers: "Statistically, adopted children have stronger identities and self-esteem than children raised by single mothers" and "will be less likely to experience a deprived and stressful childhood." If that's not bad enough, children raised by single mothers are "five times more likely to grow up in poverty, three to four times more likely to commit suicide, [and] two to three times more likely to abuse drugs; 70 percent of long-term inmates grew up without fathers. Girls without fathers in the home are more likely to get pregnant before marriage."

Statistics--even if correct--are not destiny as Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Gerald Ford, and countless other highly successful men and women who grew up without their biological fathers prove. While most adoptees, like everyone else, manage to make it through adolescence intact, the adopted in general have more trouble than most. In fact, several respected studies and journal articles describe the problems as quite specifically: adopted children have a tendency toward learning disability and under achievement, they are likely to exhibit high dependency and fearfulness along with low self-identity. Statistically, adoptees are over-represented in populations of those who are troubled: drug addicts, prison inmates, suicide victims, adolescent and young adult clinics and resident treatment centers. This is what they do not tell pregnant women and teens when they show up at an adoption agency or find themselves negotiating a private adoption through an attorney.

FATHERS WHO OPPOSE THE ADOPTION
If fathers-to-be want to be involved with their child, well then, that's a different story. The adoption industry works hard to keep them out of the picture by getting laws passed making it close to impossible to assert their rights as we've seen in the case of Terry Achane and many others. The industry also undermines the mother's trust in the father of their child. American Adoptions tells mothers-to-be "Even if the father of your baby wants you to keep your baby, your child may have a father whom you and your child won't be able to rely on." Focus on the Family is more blunt: "Sorry but babies RARELY have that effect on guys...especially guys who have sex with you before saying 'I do.' Moreover, it's not a baby's job to turn some guy who's possibly self-centered, immature and irresponsible into your ideal partner."

We at FMF happen to know a number of unmarried but committed fathers who are in unmarried, long term relationships as strong as any marriage. And in recent cases--Dusten Brown, Terry Achane, Jake Strickland--we have seen fathers do all they can to be able to raise their own children. The agencies make such fathers out to be untrustworthy bums, but that is only because agencies wish to get their babies to "sell" to waiting customers. Too many fathers demanding the right to raise their own children get in the way of a viable business model--that is, make money. Not enough babies and an agency (for profit or not) will have to go out of business; the director making a hundred grand will have to look for a new job. Thus, the attack on fathers.

Brigham Young University Professor of Family Sciences Terry Olson writes for the tax-payer financed
Infant Adoption Training Program run by the National Council for Adoption: "If she is not in self-betrayal, then with counselor-assisted knowledge and experience, she [the mother-to-be] can express or insist on her preferred definition of the future for the child and for herself" which are "a marriage of stability with mutual commitment to parent" or adoption. That's it. Either or. No single-mother can possibly raise a child, according to Olson. He further explains to the counselors how to manage the mother if the putative father fails to recognizes the best interests of the child, i.e. doesn't want to marry or place the child for adoption. The counselor must make the young woman see that "the self-betraying meaning of the demands of such a father so as not to be victimized by them." If the father wants to raise the child himself, the counselor has to raise the "the nature of the future relationship of the child with its biological mother" and the possibility of "the father's future marriage to someone else." In other words, let the woman know that the father may not allow her to have a relationship with her child, and another woman may take her place. And if grandma wants to raise the baby, counselors must let mothers-to-be know that: "the father being at the bidding of the child's grandmother is fertile ground for creating an uncertain foundation for the care of the child."

If the father persists in opposing adoption, the industry uses the same kind of perverted logic that it uses to convince mothers to give up their children, i.e. adoption is the selfless, brave and loving decision. American Adoptions tells fathers:
"Embarrassment is common because these men sometimes feel like they didn't live up to their responsibilities as the birth father....If you are a father in a similar situation but are unsure of whether to support the adoption, please understand that supporting an adoption doesn't portray you as irresponsible, weak or a man not living up to the responsibilities of a father. In fact, it is quite the opposite.
"Supporting the birth mother's adoption plan is the most responsible decision you can make....Making such a difficult decision takes a great deal of strength that will make others proud. You will be remembered as a true blessing to not only your family and the adoptive family, but also to your son or daughter."
What the adoption industry doesn't tell mothers is that about 20 percent of first parents marry each other and go on to have other children together. Even when the parents do not marry, fathers are often fully involved with their children. The truth is that substituting an adoptive mother for a natural mother in order to gain an adoptive father is a losing bargain for all--except the adoption industry.--jane
_________________________________
SOURCES 
Focus on the Family: Choosing the Best for Your Baby
Lang: "Adoption: The Best Option"
LDS Church: Policies on Moral Issues
American Adoptions: Father of the Baby
Terry Olson "In Adoption Practices in the Human World"
*The link:
http://ncfaeducation.org/BirthparentCounseling/pdf/AdoptionPracticesInTheHumaneWorld.pdf, worked in November and I printed the article. It no longer works.
Lost and Found: The Adoption Experience

FROM FMF:
Utah to Birth Fathers: Go Back to the Grave!
If LDS Family Service ends adoption, it own't be soon enough

This is the fourth in a series on how the adoption industry convinces vulnerable mothers to give up their children. Others in the series: How money rules infant adoption was posted December 1; How the adoption industry convinces women they aren't 'ready to parent' was posted on December 15; Is giving up a child for adoption a 'loving' decision? was posted December 20.

RECOMMENDED READING
Lost and Found: The Adoption Experience by Betty Jean Lifton
Still a classic, more than three decades later, with new material added on the controversies of the day, including egg and sperm donation. Highly recommended as a first read for adoptees and adoptive parents.  "[Looks] at adoption from all sides of the triangle: adoptee, birth mother, adoptive parents . . . A provocative, comprehensive inquiry."---Kirkus Reviews
"Honest and moving."---New York Times 
As a point of fact, it came out the same year as Birthmarkthe Lorraine's memoir, which opened the lid on the trauma of relinquishing mothers, then considered too outre to be talked about in polite company. It is hard to understand today how swept under the rug even talking about the issues of adoption was once. 
Son by Lois Lowrey
I came upon this book at a free book exchange and I admit I had never heard of it, or the author, but she is a prolific and honored writer for young adults. This book, the last in a trilogy, is about what a mother will endure to get back to her son. Set in a futuristic society where young women have babies for others, it is a chilling reminder that we today are not so far away from this "unthinkable" society ourselves. Anyone with contact with a teen considering adoption should give them this book. --lorraine

11 comments :

  1. "Making such a difficult decision takes a great deal of strength that will make others proud. You will be remembered as a true blessing to not only your family and the adoptive family, but also to your son or daughter."

    This doesn't even make sense. This writing is so convoluted that it pains me.

    I can see where adoptive parents may view a father who has chosen to give up his child as a blessing. But, the other two groups? No, I cannot see him being sainted for his choice by either of them.

    Even if a b-family believes adoption is the best choice, I highly doubt many of them view their son as a blessing for giving away their blood to strangers.

    And, I do not view my adoption as a blessing, so I don't view either parent as a blessing for having given me up for adoption. What an ignorant assumption to make! It makes the assumption that adoptees will automatically have better lives with adoptive parents.

    The actual blessing: It's a blessing to have found my father and to have developed a relationship with him. He's a blessing because he's chosen to take the reunion ride with me. That's an actual blessing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This article really touches me. I am a natural mother from the nineties. After the breakup with my boyfriend, the adoption agency offer to support my loving decision by having me live with one of their host families in another state during the last month of my pregnancy. I found out years later the state I gave birth in it was easier to terminate both mine and his paternal rights and it also isolated me from my family and her father. The adoption agency was also very good at marketing, I was told that the couple that raise my daughter that the dad was a profession and the mom was a house wife. I recently found my daughter and found out that her adoptive mother was a high school dropout and the dad just had some vocational training and to top it all off they both had mental health issues. Looking back her father was not given the opportunity to raise his child the agency didn’t care about his rights and what I thought was a loving decision was not. I just provided a product to be bought and sold.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How can the adoption Industry still treat fathers this way? And coerce young vulnerable pregnant girls to believe it? I know it goes on, but I am dumbfounded !
    In my closed adoption from the 1950's there is only mention of my birth mother. When she was ever mentioned at all my AP's refer to her as "the girl ". Birth father never mentioned. I was told once and only once that " the girl" listed him as unknown.
    But things have not progressed very far, have they? The adoption Industry has no right to treat fathers this way, and to brainwash young girls . But how can this practice be stopped?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The more fathers raise holy hell about losing their children, the great input all fathers will be able to have about raising their children. And then--we need a new Supreme Court, one devoid of Adoptive Father John Roberts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I placed my son for adoption so he would have a Dad.
    The man I made a child with wanted me to have an abortion not Father material in my eyes so I carried him alone and kissed him goodbye hoping his new Mom and a father would make his life complete. I met the father 35 years later to hear he had just placed 2 children a 3 year old and a 5 year old for adoption as it did not work out for him and the Mother of his other children. All the children now have both a Mom and Dad.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course father figures are important, but isn't adding dad a more logical solution for going from Mother+Baby to Mom, Dad & baby, rather than splitting up mother and child and add the child to two would-be parents?

    ReplyDelete
  7. The mind games of these agencies are absolutely criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Suit: Utah adoption laws permit "legalized fraud and kidnapping". 12 biological fathers from across the U.S say state's adoption rules unconstitutional.

    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57432393-78/utah-adoption-lawsuit-fathers.html.csp

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anon 6:23pm wrote:"I placed my son for adoption so he would have a Dad."
    "the children now have both a Mom and Dad."

    There is no guarantee that the adoptive father will stick around. Adoptive parents divorce just as frequently as bio-parents. My natural mother was also brainwashed to believe that I had to have a two-parent married couple as parents. My APs ended up divorcing when I was still a toddler. You will find plenty of other first mothers who bought into the two-parent myth only to discover that the 'amazing' adoptive parents they chose get divorced.

    My a-father never financially supported me after the divorce either. I guess I was supposed to get a job instead of going to pre-school. Also, many (most?) children prefer to be raised by their original parents, and not be given away, regardless of whether it is one parent or both, or if it is their mother or father.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Respectfully snipped, Robin said:

    My natural mother was also brainwashed to believe that I had to have a two-parent married couple as parents. My APs ended up divorcing when I was still a toddler. You will find plenty of other first mothers who bought into the two-parent myth only to discover that the 'amazing' adoptive parents they chose get divorced.

    Raising my hand here... yeah, I too was brainwashed in "thinking" my child needed two parents! And of course, they did divorce, but fortunately (I think) she was 16 years old when it happened.

    ReplyDelete
  11. HDW

    So true! The thinking is CRAZY.

    I am a natural mother and fell prey to the whole "two parents" thing. In fact my sons natural father did fight for my son in court. But because of my actions and the fact that he wasn't rolling in the dough made him have to stop. And I, was judging him. I had this attitude of "how could a man possibly know what is best for my child?"

    But perfect strangers know better??????

    Society still thinks like this. Sad

    ReplyDelete

We welcome comments from all, and appreciate letting us know how you relate to adoption when you leave your first comment.

COMMENTS ARE MODERATED. Our blog, our decision whether to publish or not. We are trying to find a way to end the endless anonymous comments, which drive many of us crazy. Pick a name! Any name. Choose the NAME/URL selection. You do not need a URL. Your name does not have to be your name IRL though we appreciate those who do, and we understand due to the sensitive nature of our subject, many will prefer to use a nom de plume. Okay with us, but the endless Anons are tiresome for everyone. If you post as "anonymous" you run the risk of not being posted.

We try to be timely but we do have other lives.

For those coming here from Networked Blogs on Facebook, if it does not allow you to make a comment, click the "x" on the gray "Networked Blogs" tool bar to exit out of that frame and it should then let you comment.